Medicaid Policy Recommendations to Your State Governor ESSAY

Medicaid Policy Recommendations to Your State Governor

We write papers for students

Tell us about your assignment and we will find the best writer for your paper.

You are a top policy advisor for your state in relation to its Medicaid program. Your governor has asked for your input into an evaluation of the state’s existing Medicaid program in light of its escalating health care expenditures. This will require that you conduct an extensive review of the program, its current goals and objectives, and whether in its current form, it is able to meet these both cost-effectively and equitably.

In a 4-5 page paper, present your Medicaid program evaluation findings as well as any recommendations that you would make to your governor about ways that the Medicaid program might be revised going forward.

In your written response consider the following points:

What are the primary achievements of your state’s current program? Be specific and support with resource information.
What are current shortcomings that you have identified in your state’s program? Be specific.
As you look to re-design your state’s Medicaid program, what would be your primary policy decision-making goal? Effectiveness or Equity?
If Effectiveness is critical- how do your program design recommendations reflect this?
If Equity is critical- how do your program design recommendations reflect this?
In what ways can program changes be made that can increase effectiveness while maintaining equity?
What recommendations would you make to the governor to reduce program costs? To improve program outcomes? What are some potential unintended consequences of your recommendations?
Summarize your policy reform recommendations and reflect on whether Medicaid should be an Entitlement or Block Grant funded program. How does your perspective align with your primary policy decision-making goal?

Distinguished

(100%)

Proficient

(85%)

Basic

(70%)

Below Expectations

(50%)

Non-Performance

(0%)

Thesis Statement

Raises the strongest objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is strongly grounded in research and logical reasoning.

Raises a plausible objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is mostly grounded in research and logical reasoning.

Raises an objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is somewhat grounded in research and logical reasoning.

Attempts to raise an objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is minimally grounded in research and logical reasoning.

The objection to the thesis is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Counter Argument

Provides a strong, thorough rebuttal to the objection. The rebuttal effectively demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and applies the principles of charity and accuracy.

Provides a rebuttal to the objection. The rebuttal mostly demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and mostly applies the principles of charity and accuracy.

Provides a limited rebuttal to the objection. The rebuttal somewhat demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and somewhat applies the principles of charity and accuracy.

Attempts to provide a rebuttal to the objection; however, the rebuttal minimally demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and does not apply the principles of charity and accuracy.

The rebuttal is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Conclusion

– Provides clear and concise closing remarks that comprehensively summarize the essay. The remarks consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problem.

Provides closing remarks that summarize the essay. The remarks mostly consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problem. The closing remarks are somewhat unclear.

Provides closing remarks that minimally summarizes the essay. The remarks minimally consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problems. The closing remarks are unclear and/or vague.

Attempts to provide closing remarks that summarize the essay, however, the remarks do not consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problem. The closing remarks are unclear and vague.

The closing remarks are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.

Written Communication: Context of and Purpose for Writing

Demonstrates methodical application of organization and presentation of content. The purpose of the writing is evident and easy to understand. Summaries, quotes, and/or paraphrases fit naturally into the sentences and paragraphs. Paper flows smoothly.

Demonstrates sufficient application of organization and presentation of content. The purpose of the writing is, for the most part, clear and easy to understand. There are some problems with the blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper flows somewhat smoothly.

Demonstrates a limited understanding of organization and presentation of content in written work. The purpose of the writing is somewhat evident but may not be integrated throughout the assignment. There are many problems with the blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper does not flow smoothly in all sections.

Organization and presentation of content are extremely limited. The purpose of the writing is unclear. There is little or no blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper does not flow smoothly when read.